Home > News & Opinion > Blog > Road to recovery

Road to recovery

Popularity tracker
By Virginia Hughes
22 May 2009

Of the hundreds of presentations at the International Meeting for Autism Research earlier this month, one got widely picked up: a preliminary study of children who 'recover' from autism.

Most people with autism are born with it, and though they may learn various coping strategies, they have it for life. But a little-known fact is that a fraction of kids with autism eventually lose those diagnoses. The controversy lies in the size of that group: estimates range wildly between 3 and 25 percent.

For the past few years, Deborah Fein of the University of Connecticut has been trying to pin down more specific numbers, and to figure out what factors (if any) lead to recovery.

In 2007, Fein’s group reported that of 73 children they diagnosed with autism at age 2, 13 — or about 18 percent — no longer met the autism criteria by age 4.

At IMFAR, Fein presented some follow-up data from an expanded study group of 20 recovered kids, 15 kids with high-functioning autism, and 23 healthy controls.

At this stage of the study, no factors distinguish the recovery group from the autism group. For example, the majority of kids in both groups have gone through behavioral interventions — intensive sessions that teach, among other things, simple speech and play skills — sometimes as much as 40 hours a week.

But what the two groups have in common may be just as interesting. Most surprisingly, they have similar rates of psychiatric problems, such as anxiety and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. That goes against the idea that the challenges of living with autism cause these additional issues, she says.

Fein is working on scanning the brains of these kids to see if there are any differences in the neural circuitry of the three groups.

But for now, she says that the important — if frustrating — message for parents is that answers won’t come quickly. "You just have to live with the uncertainty for a number of years, give your child the best treatment you can, and see what happens."

Comments

Name: Ros K
23 July 2009 - 8:34AM

In the 1990's their were very few ABA Therapist . I found to young inexperienced Psychologist to run an ABA Program in my Home. They exploited my whole Family. They taught him to speak. They started a School in NYC. but the wealthier Children received more help. Our Yearly donations were never enough despite that they are a funded Program.
My Son has made more progress in his current ABA program. We need more quality Programs that will continue Educating and maintaining the skills of Adult Autistic people. ABA is the only documented technique and all Programs should be based on it's principals.
I live in fear but what my Son's future will be because he has only made it half way. Education for Autistic people should not end at Twenty One; and Teachers who can not properly Teach them should be dismissed.
All Children are entitled to an appropriate Education but Autistic Children have little chance if their parent's are not wealthy.
The Psychologist in NYC. still dispute that ABA is what works. The Teachers do not have any training in it. It is time to fire those who refuse to learn what works.

Add a Comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting.