Skip to main content

Spectrum: Autism Research News

Twin differences

by  /  31 July 2012
THIS ARTICLE IS MORE THAN FIVE YEARS OLD

This article is more than five years old. Autism research — and science in general — is constantly evolving, so older articles may contain information or theories that have been reevaluated since their original publication date.

You might think that in the cramped quarters of the womb, twins would experience pretty much the same environment. But a new study, published 15 July in Genome Research, suggests otherwise.

Identical twins, who have the same DNA, are born with widespread differences in their epigenetic profiles —  chemical modifications to DNA that control when and where genes are expressed.

Studies suggest that when one identical twin has autism, the other will also have it about 40 to 90 percent of the time. A better understanding of how the prenatal environment influences epigenetics could help pinpoint early environmental risk factors for autism and help explain those cases in which only one twin has autism.

Researchers in Australia showed in 2011 that gene expression in twins varies widely at birth, as does their methylation — a type of epigenetic change — at certain sites in the genome.

In the new study, the same group analyzed methylation at 20,000 sites across the genome in the umbilical cord tissue, cord blood and placenta of 12 sets of fraternal and 22 sets of identical twins. (Fraternal twins share as much DNA as non-twin siblings, so comparing identical and fraternal twins can give scientists a sense of how much genetics contributes to the factor under study.)

The researchers found that epigenetic profiles vary significantly among both types of twins. They speculate that the differences arise partly randomly and partly from environmental factors, such as differences in blood supply, exposure to infection and the weight of each twin’s placenta.

In an unexpected twist, identical twins who shared a placenta show greater differences between their epigenetic profiles than identical twins who did not, suggesting that competition for resources may play a role.

The researchers say these changes may persist throughout life, potentially setting up a fetal “program” for developing certain diseases.