Home > News & Opinion > Blog > 2008 > Un-identical twins

Un-identical twins

Popularity tracker
Apoorva Mandavilli
28 March 2008

The first indication that autism has genetic origins came from twin studies. Ditto for schizophrenia and many other diseases.

The idea that monozygotic twins born after a single zygote divides into two embryos are genetically identical has been the defining feature of thousands of studies, including ones that have tried to tease out the different influences of genes and environment.

Apparently, they were all a bit off.

According to a study in this monthʼs issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics, monozygotic twins arenʼt exactly identical.

It turns out that these twins have different copy number variations in which large pieces of DNA are either missing or are present in multiple copies. As weʼve been learning with increasing frequency over the past two years, these copy number variations may be important in diseases such as autism and schizophrenia. Of the 19 pairs in this study, for example, only one twin in each of nine pairs showed signs of Parkinsonʼs disease or dementia.

We already knew that identical twins become gradually less identical as they age and are exposed to different environments, accumulating epigenetic modifications. These are changes in which the genetic sequence itself remains the same, but chemicals that attach to the genes turn them on or off, and in that way alter each twinʼs risk of developing, say, cancer or diabetes.

Itʼs not yet clear whether copy number variations are similarly accumulated over time, or whether they are present at birth or before. And itʼs much too soon to conclude that the variations may be the reason for the dementia seen in one twin but not the other.

Whatʼs perfectly clear, however, is that monozygotic twins arenʼt perfectly identical.

Comments

Name: Rabiya
3 April 2009 - 12:40PM

it helped me a lot

Name: Lorraine Stone
3 April 2009 - 12:40PM

My sister and I are identical twins. She had breast cancer and I didn't. Her breast cancer, I firmly believe, was caused by her exposure to the polluted air quality after 9/11. She worked in Lower Manhattan, in the Wall Street area, and lives in Park Slope, Brooklyn, just across the river from Lower Manhattan. The wind blew the stuff from the Twin Towers destruction across the river to Park Slope. On 9/11 my husband and I were some 3,000 miles away, in Paris, France. We lived in Oceanside, New York, 35 miles from Manhattan. I never developed breast cancer, although I visited the Twin Towers area late in October 2001 for about 2 hours. Because we are identical twins and my sister had breast cancer, my doctors keep very close watch on me. At one point, I was advised to have a Braca test, which Medicare would not pay for except if the patient had had cancer. Which, as indicated, I did not have. I called my sister and asked her to have the test, believing that if she did not have the gene, then neither did I. Am I correct in this assumption?

Thank you.

Lorraine Stone

Name: richard
3 April 2009 - 12:40PM

what is unidentical twins? What is identical twins

Name: CDKL5 mum
3 April 2009 - 12:40PM

My identical twin daughters have the same CDKL5 mutation yet are very differently affected.
One has high functioning autism the other atypical Rett syndrome. It was thought this was due to x-inactivation but this has been ruled out
http://www.cdkl5.com

Add a Comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting.

Question: What is 10 + 4 ?
Your answer: